S
Spirituality

Does lakshmana's anger in Ramayanam is justifying or not?

YES 55.6% 44.4% NO

Discussion

YES 5 NO 4

Sign in to cast your vote and join the debate.

Sign In

YES

5 56%
S

Sahadeva

Last seen 48d ago

Even after knowing Kunti abandoned him at birth, Karna still treated her with respect.

A

Alex

Last seen 48d ago

His anger during Rama's exile period came from seeing king treated unfairly. He cannot tolerate insults or unfair treatment towards sitaram.

A

adwita

Last seen 49d ago

Lakshmana saw rama and sita suffering in forest despite their innocence. His anger reflected pain against injustice not self gain. Even when furious Lakshmana always obeyed Ramas calming advice

S

Snehasri

Last seen 48d ago

Lakshmana was an incarnation of Adisesha, His duty was to serve and defend Lord Vishnu. Whenever negative energy tried to undermine Rama, Lakshmana's anger served as an instrument of cosmic justice.

S

surya

Last seen 10d ago

When Surpanakha attempted to attack Sita in the forest, Lakshmana’s anger was a justified defense to protect his sister-in-law(Sita Mata)

NO

4 44%
S

sowjanya

Last seen 47d ago

When Kaikeyi demands Rama's Exile, His harsh words against kaikeyi can be seen as crossing limts of respect.

C

Chandra

Last seen 9d ago

Scriptures often described anger as dangerous which not governed by wisdom. Prince trained in dharma expected to self control under pressure.

G

ganesh

Last seen 1d ago

If Rama had not calmed him repeatedly. Lakshmana's reactions might have caused violence with Ayodhya itself.

S

sandhya

Last seen 48d ago

When Kaikeyi demands Rama's Exile, His harsh words against kaikeyi can be seen as crossing limts of respect.

More in Spirituality · You may also like See all →
Replies

Sign in to join this debate

Search DiscussFly
Find debates, people and topics
Report Message
Please explain clearly what is wrong with this message.