Should state consider three capitals or one capital?
One capital
57.1%
42.9%
Three capitals
Politics
📖 1m
Should peru implement high anti crime policies, even if it impact high strict culture on ordinary people?
John
2
0
Politics
📖 1m
Should Celebrities Enter Politics?
suresh
1
0
Politics
📖 1m
Is the present Andhra Pradesh government working well for the development of the state?
surya
1
0
Politics
📖 1m
If Pawan Kalyan participates in upcoming Telangana elections, will he become a king maker?
sandhya
1
0
Reactions
Loading…
One capital
surya
Suppose if we develop three capitals people will actually get confused where to go for if there is some work that has to be done.Government records, departments, and institutions remain centralized and easier to manage. Governments can invest in roads, industries, universities, ports, and hospitals throughout the state while maintaining a single administrative capital.
Chandra
Cost of one capital building will be very high, imagine building three capitals and getting 0 returns from one capital would really beat badly.
divya
Suppose if government buildings are in one people it will be easy for coordination. People do not need to travel hundreds of kilometers when there is a dependency obviously there will be dependency. Decision making will take considerable time with capitals in multiple places.
ganesh
You do not need to have three capitals for distributed development, why not chose one capital and develop other areas. Its like wasting people expenses, consider if i keep capital and build government office, hardly people will chose to come to that remote area where it just started development. Yes private companies does come but when we keep capital
Three capitals
Snehasri
Suppose i am in rayalaseema and some some capital happening near by my area i will feel more included in the state instead of developing some where far from my place.
suresh3549
GOvt institutions located in multiple areas attract infrastructures and jobs will be present throughout the state instead of one single city, cash flow and business would run everywhere in the state. Roads railways and travelling will be well developed by distributing development.
vjay
With three capitals, development will distribute it wont restrict to single area. So now people argue like why do we need to have capitals in order to develop any area? But keeping that strategy by making three capitals development will eventually happen and it does not need to push. If we do not define capital, one govt will develop one area and other govt develop other area and it wont work in that way.