Should state consider three capitals or one capital?

Suppose if we develop three capitals people will actually get confused where to go for if there is some work that has to be done.Government records, departments, and institutions remain centralized and easier to manage. Governments can invest in roads, industries, universities, ports, and hospitals throughout the state while maintaining a single administrative capital.

Cost of one capital building will be very high, imagine building three capitals and getting 0 returns from one capital would really beat badly.

Suppose if government buildings are in one people it will be easy for coordination. People do not need to travel hundreds of kilometers when there is a dependency obviously there will be dependency. Decision making will take considerable time with capitals in multiple places.

You do not need to have three capitals for distributed development, why not chose one capital and develop other areas. Its like wasting people expenses, consider if i keep capital and build government office, hardly people will chose to come to that remote area where it just started development. Yes private companies does come but when we keep capital

Instead of creating one dominant metropolitan area, the state can encourage the emergence of several strong urban centers. This may reduce excessive migration and pressure on a single city.

It will open government positions very close to the people who lives by there and it is easy for them to travel to native, instead of keeping one single capital somewhere in the heap which will be far from the opposite state area.

Suppose i am in rayalaseema and some some capital happening near by my area i will feel more included in the state instead of developing some where far from my place.

suresh3549

Last seen 35d ago

GOvt institutions located in multiple areas attract infrastructures and jobs will be present throughout the state instead of one single city, cash flow and business would run everywhere in the state. Roads railways and travelling will be well developed by distributing development.

With three capitals, development will distribute it wont restrict to single area. So now people argue like why do we need to have capitals in order to develop any area? But keeping that strategy by making three capitals development will eventually happen and it does not need to push. If we do not define capital, one govt will develop one area and other govt develop other area and it wont work in that way.